![]() ![]() Many of us still rely on remembering where files are stored (in folders) or the various software tools recent files list (i.e, Excel, Word, PowerPoint, etc.). But high system resource usage, slow indexing and an index limit of 100,000 documents (unless you pay £34 for the Professional upgrade) spoils this utility. Surprisingly, searching for content on your computer generally is a pain to do. The search technology is good as well, with options including Boolean, phonetic, forced stemming and even “approximation” that allows for letter substitutions in keywords. It’s also fast, summarising both structure and concepts from your results – you can, for example, refocus email results to one name (author or recipient) in a single click, with the sidebar changing to reflect that new content. Navigating the interface soon becomes second nature. If you often use Windows search, you will probably benefit from a dedicated desktop search. Document previews show near-perfect formatting and, by moving the filtering and refinement to the sidebar, Exalead has created room for the presentation to dynamically adapt to the content of current search results. Copernic is a niche product thats quite obviously not for everyone. Ultimately, though, WDS remains average in this company.Įxalead has dared to be different with its One:Desktop product, most noticeably with the interface. ![]() Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially. We also like the attention to detail, such as when laptop battery life drops to 25%, the indexing stops to save power, and that the indexer runs as a system service. Tools such as X1 (x1.com), Copernic Desktop Search (). Where WDS does score is in performance: it’s quick to index and return results, and system resource use is low too. Search refinement is better than Google, although it doesn’t provide the best levels of instant result information. the update window is not informative and it just seems like you are. Office application support is exemplary, document previewing good, and there are plenty of handy right-click options, including copy and print. i was a very loyal copernic user until 3.0. The interface is unchanged from the last version, meaning functional but not exceptional. Microsoft has done better, with the all-new Windows Desktop Search 3 (WDS) built upon the same engine as Instant Search in Outlook 2007 (see issue 148, p50). Google seems to have put more effort in the rest of the suite, with the Gadget Sidebar offering a selection of newsfeeds, clocks and desktop games System resource usage was also quite high. jCopernic 2000 is a superb browser add-on for 'searching the. It may work in exactly the same way as Google on the internet, but don’t expect useful category filtering (just a long list sorted by date or relevancy) or integrated document previews. In use, we found Google Desktop to be comparatively slow too, and sticking to a familiar browser-based online search methodology is a mixed blessing. By including Gmail messages in the index, the initial building process took a staggering 23 hours, and even with the Gmail option removed it was still among the slowest on test. Google Desktop promises much, but the actual delivery is a little slow. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |